CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WHO RECEIVED BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION AND THE INCIDENCE OF SERIOUS INFECTIONS: A MULTICENTER STUDY

BackgroundKidney transplant patients due to both primary kidney involvement of chronic/autoimmune inflammatory diseases and end-stage kidney disease related to amyloidosis are followed up in rheumatology clinics. Biological agents one of the treatment options in kidney transplant recipients with chronic/autoimmune inflammatory disease.ObjectivesHowever, there is insufficient data on the development of infection in kidney transplant recipients who received biological treatment. Herein, we aimed to determine the incidence of serious infections in patients with kidney transplant recipients who are received biological therapy.MethodsKidney transplant recipients who are received biological agents due to rheumatologic disease were included in the study. Patients' demographic features, transplantation data, biological treatment, development of infection and severity of infection were screened retrospectively. Infections that requiring hospitalization were defined as severe infections.ResultsA total of 31 patients were included in the study, 14 (45%) of whom were female and mean age was 41 ±9 years. Twenty-five patients (80%) of them were non-preemptive kidney transplant and mean duration of hemodialysis before the transplantation was 40 ±40 months. Twenty-three patients (74%) had end stage kidney failure due to FMF-amyloidosis(Figure-1-). Seventeen patients (54%) received anakinra, 11 patients (35%) received canakinumab and 3 patients (10%) received etanercept with other immunosuppressive treatment. Mean treatment duration of biological agents was 4.2±2.6 years. Two patients developed solid organ malignancy and one patient developed hematological malignancy after transplantation. Sixteen of the patients (52%) were hospitalized at least once due to infection and 4 patients (13%) died due to infection. The cause of decease in two patients was COVID-19.ConclusionRheumatic diseases are an important cause of end-stage renal disease and definitive treatment is kidney transplantation. Kidney transplant recipients due to rheumatological disease also use biological agents in the post-transplantation period. Kidney transplant recipients have higher risk for the development of infection since they receive immunosuppressive therapy and use of biologic agents may further increase the risk for development infection. Meyer et al reported that infection developed in 54 of 187 solid organ transplant recipients using biological agents.[1] Mean treatment duration of biological agents was 12 months in this study. The incidence of infection was 54% in our study. Mean treatment duration of biological agent was 4.2 year was considered main reason for higher incidence of infection in our study.Reference[1]Meyer F, Weil-Verhoeven D, Prati C, Wendling D, Verhoeven F. Safety of biologic treatments in solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021 Dec;51(6):1263-1273. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.08.013. Epub 2021 Aug 26. Erratum in: Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2022 Aug;55:152015. PMID: 34507811.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

PERICARDITIS AFTER COVID-19 VACCINATION: A CASE SERIES

BackgroundCOVID-19 vaccination campaigns successfully impacted on viral spreading and in particular on clinical course of the disease. However, secondary to a highly extended vaccination program, several local and systemic adverse events associated with mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have been reported. Pericarditis and myocarditis are examples of cardiac complications related to these vaccines. In particular, cases of pericarditis have occurred after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (mostly secondary to vaccination with Moderna than Pfizer-BioNTech), especially in male adolescents and young adults, more often after the second dose. The incidence is approximately of 1-2 cases/100.000.ObjectivesAim of our study was to study the clinical profile of pericarditis occurred within 30 days after COVID-19 vaccines in our clinic.MethodsWe present a case series of patients who developed pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination in the Department of Internal Medicine at Fatebenefratelli Hospital in Milan, followed from December 1, 2021 to April 15, 2022.ResultsTwenty-five individuals, of which 18 (72%) were women and 7 (28%) were males, had vaccine related pericarditis. Two patients were vaccinated with AstraZeneca, 2 with Moderna, the remaining with Pfizer-BioNTech. Median age was of 42 years. Of all patients, one subject was affected by constrictive effusive pericarditis, while another required treatment of pericarditis with Anakinra, switched to Canakinumab after severe skin reactions, because of failure of therapeutic response to first-line treatments.Two patients required hospital admission, in one case for a transient constrictive pericarditis. In the remaining cases clinical symptoms associated with post-vaccines pericarditis were mild and didn't require hospitalization.Chest pain was reported in 100% of cases, whereas pericardial effusion (in one case larger than 10 mm) was evidenced in 30% of subjects. Eighty percent of patients experienced tachycardia, whereas 90% reported asthenia.An increase in indices of inflammation (CRP) was documented in 50% of patients, usually mild.With regard to therapy, 90% of patients were treated with NSAIDs, 95% with colchicine, while 50% of cases required treatment with low-dose steroids.ConclusionCOVID-19 vaccination induces a particular form of pericarditis, often insidious and very troublesome, but with good prognosis. The clinical phenotype showed less typical chest pain, often normal indices of inflammation and little or no instrumental changes, but patients often experimented tachycardia and functional limitation. With regard to therapy, we used NSAIDs at adequate dosages to control the clinical condition, or low-dose colchicine. Low doses of cortisone (e.g., prednisone 5-10 mg a day) were useful in the presence of marked asthenia or systemic symptoms. Beta-blockers or ivabradine were used in the presence of tachycardia.References[1]Barda N, Children 2021, 8(7), 607;Safety of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 in a Nationwide setting. N Engl J med 2021;385:1078-1090.[2]Diaz GA, Myocarditis and Pericarditis After Vaccination for COVID-19. JAMA 2021;326 (12): 1210-1212.[3]Bibhuti D, Myocarditis and Pericarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: What Do We Know So Far?. Children 2021, 8(7), 607.[4]Giacomo Maria Viani, Patrizia Pedrotti, Romano Seregni, and Brucato Antonio;Effusive–constrictive pericarditis after the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine (Comirnaty): a case report;European Heart Journal - Case Reports (2022) 6(2), 1–6.[5]Francesco Perna, Elena Verecchia, Gaetano Pinnacchio, Laura Gerardino, Antonio Brucato, and Raffaele Manna;Rapid resolution of severe pericardial effusion using anakinra in a patient with COVID-19 vaccine-related acute pericarditis relapse:a case report;European Heart Journal - Case Reports (2022) 6, 1–6.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

Pandemic stress induces systemic immune changes and placental inflammation independently of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancies

Problem: Environmental stress during pregnancy has known impacts on both maternal and fetal health. In terms of theCOVID-19 pandemic, the majority of published work has focused on the impact of the infection itself, without considering the potential immune impact of pandemic related-stress.We, therefore, assessed the impact of pandemic stress, independently of SARS-CoV-2 infection, on the circulating and placental immune profiles of pregnant individuals. Method(s): Placentas from 239 patients were collected at the Sainte- Justine Hospital, Montreal, Canada. Of these, 199 patients delivered during the pandemic and were exposed to pandemic stress with (+: 79) or without (-: 120) SARS-CoV-2 infection, the latter exposed to pandemic stress only. Pre-pandemic historic controls (uncomplicated pregnancies, Ctrl: 40), were also included. Placental biopsies were collected to assess cytokine levels by ELISAs and histopathological lesions. A sub-study with 35 pre-pandemic pregnancies (unexposed) and 20 who delivered during the pandemic (exposed) was also conducted. The latter (exposed/unexposed) were all uncomplicated pregnancies. We collected maternal blood prior to delivery for immunophenotyping, and plasma/peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated. Inflammatory mediators in the plasma were quantified by ELISAs. Co-culture assays with PBMCs and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were performed to assess endothelial activation. Demographical/obstetrical data were obtained through chart review. Result(s): SARS-CoV-2+ patients were multiethnic (63.4%), had higher pre-pregnancyBMI (28.9 vs. 24.8 inCtrl, P<.05), and elevated preterm birth rate (16.5% vs. 5.8% in SARS-CoV-2-, P < .05 and 0.0% in Ctrl, P < .01). In the placentas, we observed an increase in the levels of IL- 1Ra (P < .05) and CRP (P < .05) in both SARS-CoV-2 groups, while IL-6 (P = .0790) and MCP-1 (P < .001) were elevated solely in SARS-CoV- 2-. These changes were predominant in placentas with inflammatory lesions on histopathological analysis. Moreover, we observed elevated CD45+ cells (P < .001) in the placentas from both SARS-CoV-2 groups versus Ctrl. Considering that the differences we observed were important in the SARS-CoV-2- group, we performed a study solely on uncomplicated pregnancies, either exposed or unexposed to pandemic stress. At the systemic level, we observed a decrease in the percentage of Th2 cells (P < .001), leading to a pro-inflammatory Th1/Th2 imbalance in exposed individuals. Decreased Treg (P < .05) and Th17 (P < .05) versus unexposed was also observed. Surprisingly, decreased levels of circulating IL-6 (P < .05), MCP-1 (P < .01), and CRP (P<.05) were seen in exposed versus unexposed individuals. Finally,we observed increased secretion of ICAM, a marker of endothelial activation, solely in endothelial cells co-cultured with PBMCs from exposed individuals. Conclusion(s): Overall, placental inflammatory profiles differed between pregnant individuals exposed to pandemic stress with or without SARS-CoV-2 infection. Moreover, we observed that the pandemic stress exposed group presented a systemic pro-inflammatory bias. This highlights the need to understand the differences between the effects of pandemic-related stress and the added burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection itself on maternal and fetal health. Our work also supports an association between an increased risk of hypertension/ preeclampsia and SARS-CoV-2 infection that might be driven in part by pandemic-related stress.

HIGH DOSE INTRAVENOUS ANAKINRA TREATMENT IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE IN SEVERE AND CRITICAL COVID-19 PATIENTS: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED STUDY IN A SINGLE CENTER

BackgroundIn COVID-19 severe disease course such as need of intensive care unit (ICU) as well as development of mortality is mainly due to cytokine storm.ObjectivesIn this study, we aimed to evaluate the high dose intravenous anakinra treatment response and outcome in patients with severe and critical COVID-19 compared to standard of care.MethodsThis retrospective observational study was carried out at a tertiary referral center. The study population consisted of two groups as follows;the patients receiving high dose intravenous anakinra (anakinra group) between 01.09.2021 and 01.02.2022 and the patients treated with standard of care (SoC, control group) as historical control group who were hospitalized between 01.07.2021 and 01.09.2021.ResultsAfter the propensity score 1:1 matching 79 patients in anakinra and 79 patients in SoC matched and included into the analysis. Mean±SD patient age was 67.4±16.7 and 67.1±16.3 years in anakinra and SoC group, respectively (p=0.9). Male gender was 38 (48.7 %) in anakinra and 36 (46.2 %) SoC (p=0.8). Overall, ICU admission was in 14.1 % (n=11) and 30.8 % (n=24) (p=0.013;OR: 6.2), intubation in 12.8 % (n=10) and 16.7 % (n=13) patients (p=0.5), 14.1 % (n=11) and 32.1 % (n=25) patients died in anakinra and control group, respectively (p=0.008;OR: 7.1)ConclusionIn our study mortality was lower in patients receiving anakinra compared to SoC. Intravenous high dose anakinra is safe and effective treatment in patients with severe and critical COVID-19.Table 1.Baseline clinical and laboratory features of patients receiving standard of care (SoC) and Anakinra before and after propensity score (PS) matchingBefore PS matchingAfter PS matchingVariablesAnakinra (n=148)SoC (n=114)p value (OR)Anakinra (n=78)SoC (n=78)p value (OR)Age (years) (mean±SD)66.8±1763.1±170.0967.4±16.767.1±16.30.9Gender, male (n, %)78 (52.7)45 (39.5)0.033 (4.5)38 (48.7)36 (46.2)0.8Duration of hospitalization (days) (median, IQR)11 (12)9 (7.3)0.027.5 (9)11 (8)0.01Comorbidities (n, %) Diabetes mellitus41/146 (28.1)39 (34.2)0.318 (23)31 (39.7)0.025 (5) Hypertension84/143 (58.7)64 (56)0.730 (61.5)50 (64)0.7 Coronary heart disease27/143 (19)24 (21)0.718 (23)20 (25.6)0.7 Heart failure18/143 (12.6)23 (20)0.114 (18)20 (25.6)0.24 Chronic renal failure31 (21)6 (5.3)<0.001 (13.06)15 (19)6 (7.7)0.035 (4.5) Chronic obstructive lung disease23/144 (16)19 (16.7)0.914 (18)15 (19)0.8 Dementia15/117 (12.8)2 (1.8)0.001 (10.4)3/61 (5)2 (2.6)0.5 Malignancy16/146 (11)8 (7)0.39 (11.5)6 (7.7)0.4 Immunosuppressive usage18/146 (12.3)2 (1.8)0.001 (10.08)5 (6.5)2 (2.6)0.2Disease severity (n, %) NIH score 3 (severe)57 (38.5)68 (59.6)0.001 (11.5)48 (61.5)44 (56.4)0.5 NIH score 4 (critical)91 (61.5)46 (40.4)30 (38.5)34 (43.6) mcHIS score (mean±SD)3.4±1.22.64±1.5<0.0012.9±13.1±1.30.2PS: Propensity score, SoC: Standard of care, OR: Odds ratio, SD: Standard deviation, IQR: Interquartile range, mcHIS: Modified Covid hyperinflammatory syndrome score, NIH: National Institute Health, ALT: Alanin aminotransferase, AST: Aspartate aminotransferaseTable 2.Outcomes of patients receiving SoC and Anakinra before and after PS matchingBefore PS matchingAfter PS matchingVariables (n, %)Anakinra (n=148)SoC (n=114)p value (OR)Anakinra (n=78)SoC (n=78)p value (OR)Pneumothorax3/134 (2.2)00.25*2/73 (2.7)00.5*Myocardial infarction3/132 (2.3)6 (5.3)0.32/72 (2.8)2/56 (3.6)1Pulmonary embolism4/134 (3)11 (9.6)0.034 (4.8)*3/73 (4.1)7 (9)0.3*Intensive care unit60 (40.5)25 (22)0.001 (10.2)11 (14.1)24 (30.8)0.013 (6.2)Intubation54 (36.5)13 (11.4)<0.001 (21.3)10 (12.8)13 (16.7)0.5Mortality56 (37.8)27 (23.7)0.015 (5.96)11 (14.1)25 (32.1)0.008 (7.1)PS: Propensity score, SoC: Standard of care, OR: Odds ratioREFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

Tocilizumab versus anakinra in COVID-19: results from propensity score matching.

Background: Tocilizumab and anakinra are anti-interleukin drugs to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) refractory to corticosteroids. However, no studies compared the efficacy of tocilizumab versus anakinra to guide the choice of the therapy in clinical practice. We aimed to compare the outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated with tocilizumab or anakinra. Methods: Our retrospective study was conducted in three French university hospitals between February 2021 and February 2022 and included all the consecutive hospitalized patients with a laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection assessed by RT-PCR who were treated with tocilizumab or anakinra. A propensity score matching was performed to minimize confounding effects due to the non-random allocation. Results: Among 235 patients (mean age, 72 years; 60.9% of male patients), the 28-day mortality (29.4% vs. 31.2%, p = 0.76), the in-hospital mortality (31.7% vs. 33.0%, p = 0.83), the high-flow oxygen requirement (17.5% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.86), the intensive care unit admission rate (30.8% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.30), and the mechanical ventilation rate (15.4% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.50) were similar in patients receiving tocilizumab and those receiving anakinra. After propensity score matching, the 28-day mortality (29.1% vs. 30.4%, p = 1) and the rate of high-flow oxygen requirement (10.1% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.081) did not differ between patients receiving tocilizumab or anakinra. Secondary infection rates were similar between the tocilizumab and anakinra groups (6.3% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.44). Conclusion: Our study showed comparable efficacy and safety profiles of tocilizumab and anakinra to treat severe COVID-19.

Inflammatory Pathways Associated with Covid-19 Severity Differ Based on Obesity Status

Background: Severe COVID-19 and obesity are characterized by higher inflammation. We aimed to examine early inflammatory patterns in people with (Ob) and without (NOb) obesity and COVID-19 and how they relate to COVID-19 disease severity Methods: Ob (BMI >30 Kg/m2) and NOb with COVID-19 matched for age, sex and WHO disease severity provided blood early after diagnosis. Immunoassays measured 57 plasma biomarkers reflecting innate immune and endothelial activation, systemic inflammation, coagulation, metabolism and microbial translocation (Fig 1). Between-group differences were assessed by Mann- Whitney. Associations between subsequent maximal COVID-19 severity (mild vs moderate/severe/critical) and biomarkers were explored by logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, hypertension (HTN) and diabetes (DM). Data are median pg/mL [IQR] or n [%] unless stated Results: Of 100 subjects (50 Ob and 50 Nob) presenting between April 2020 and March 2021, characteristics (Ob vs Nob) included: age 65 [23-91] vs 65 [21-95];female sex 27 (48%) vs 28 (56%);BMI 33.7 [30.0-71.8] vs 23.3 [15.3-25.9];disease severity mild 22 [48%] vs 23 [46%], moderate 15 [30%] vs 13 [26%], severe 6 [12%] vs 7 [14%];HTN 30 (60%) vs 17 (34%);DM 19 [38%] vs 6 [12%];days from symptom onset 7 [2-17] vs 8 [1-15];vaccinated 3 (6%) vs 0 (0%). Compared to NOb, Ob had higher IFN-alpha (1.8 [0.6;11] vs 0.9 [0.1;4.7]), CRP (10 mAU/mL [9.6;10.2] vs 9.7 [7.2;10]), IL-1RA (197 [122;399] vs 138 [88;253]), IL-4 (288 AU/mL [161;424] vs 205 [82;333]), vWF (252 [166;383] vs 163 [96;318]), Zonulin (114 ng/mL [77;131] vs 57 [18;106]), Resistin (956 [569;1153] vs 727 [712;1525]), Leptin (3482 [1513;5738] vs 848 [249;2114]), and lower Adiponectin (1.12 mg/L [0.09;1.5] vs 1.5 [1.18;1.93]), all p< 0.05. In both groups higher, proinflammatory IL-18 and lower levels of antiinflammatory CCL22 and IL-5 were associated with higher odds of disease severity, and lower E-selectin with higher disease severity only in Ob. However, in NOb higher type 3 interferons (IL-28A), macrophage activation (sCD163, CCL3) and vascular inflammation markers (ICAM-1, VCAM-1), along with higher S100B, GM-CSF and leptin were also associated with disease severity, a pattern not observed in Ob (Fig 1) Conclusion(s): Although Ob had higher overall levels of inflammation than NOb, few biomarkers predicted subsequent COVID-19 severity in Ob. These differential inflammatory patterns suggest dysregulated immune responses in Ob with COVID-19. (Figure Presented).

Covid-19 Vaccination Impacts Functional Immune Responses and Plasma Proteome in Plwh

Background: The impact of COVID-19 infection or COVID-19 vaccination on the immune system of people living with HIV (PLWH) is unclear. We therefore studied the effects of COVID-19 infection or vaccination on functional immune responses and systemic inflammation in PLWH. Method(s): Between 2019 and 2021, 1985 virally suppressed, asymptomatic PLWH were included in the Netherlands in the 2000HIV study (NCT039948350): 1514 participants enrolled after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic were separated into a discovery and validation cohort. PBMCs were incubated with different stimuli for 24 hours: cytokine levels were measured in supernatants. ~3000 targeted plasma proteins were measured with Olink Explore panel. Past COVID-19 infection was proven when a positive PCR was reported or when serology on samples from inclusion proved positive. Compared were unvaccinated PLWH with and without past COVID-19 infection, and PLWH with or without anti-COVID-19 vaccination excluding those with past COVID-19 infection. Result(s): 471 out of 1514 participants were vaccinated (median days since vaccination: 33, IQR 16-66) and 242 had a past COVID-19 infection (median days since +PCR: 137, IQR 56-206). Alcohol, smoking, drug use, BMI, age, latest CD4 count and proportion with viral blips were comparable between groups. Systemic inflammation as assessed by targeted proteomics showed 89 upregulated and 43 downregulated proteins in the vaccinated participants. In contrast, individuals with a past COVID-19 infection display lower levels of 138 plasma proteins compared to the uninfected group (see figure). 'Innate immune system' and 'cell death' were upregulated in pathway analysis in vaccinated PLWH, but downregulated in COVID-19 infected participants. The increased systemic inflammation of the COVID-19 vaccinated group was accompanied by lower TNF-alpha and IL-1beta production capacity upon restimulation with a range of microbial stimuli, while production of IL-1Ra was increased. In COVID-19 infected PLWH only a reduced production of TNF-alpha to S. pneumonia was significant. Vaccinated PLWH also showed upregulation of platelet aggregation pathways. Conclusion(s): COVID-19 vaccination in PLWH leads to an increased systemic inflammation, but less effective cytokine production capacity of its immune cells upon microbial stimulation. This pattern is different from that of COVID-19 infection that leads to a decreased inflammatory profile and only minimal effects on cytokine production capacity. (Figure Presented).

Cytokine Profile in Different Post-Covid-19 Condition Phenotypes

Background: At least 10% of SARS-CoV-2 infected patients suffer from persistent symptoms for >12 weeks, known as post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) or Long Covid. Reported symptomatology is diverse with >200 physical and neurological debilitating symptoms. Here, we analyzed pro-inflammatory cytokine levels as a potential mechanism underlying persistent symptomatology. Method(s): Clinical data and samples used belong to the KING cohort extension, which includes clinically well characterized PCC (N=358, 59 persistent symptoms evaluated), COVID-19 recovered and uninfected subjects. We used Gower distances to calculate symptom's similarity between PCC and Ward's hierarchical clustering method to identify different symptom patterns among PCC patients. Cytokine levels of randomly selected PCC, recovered and uninfected subjects (N=193) were measured on plasma samples collected >6 months after acute infection using the 30-Plex Panel for Luminex. Mann- Whitney t-test was used to compare PCC vs recovered groups and Kruskal-Wallis t-test for >2 groups comparisons (PCC vs recovered vs Uninfected and within PCC clusters). FDR correction was applied for statistical significance (p-adj). Result(s): Hierarchical clustering identified 5 different PCC clusters according to their symptomatology, where PCC3 and PCC5 clusters showed higher prevalence of women ( >80%) and more persistent symptoms, while acute COVID-19 was mild in >80% of the patients. We selected 91 PCC (belonging to each cluster), 57 recovered and 45 uninfected subjects for cytokine profiling (Table 1). 13 soluble markers were significantly elevated (IL-1beta, Eotaxin, MIP-1beta, MCP-1, IL-15, IL-5, HGF, IFN-alpha, IL-1RA, IL-7, MIG, IL-4 and IL-8) in PCC and recovered groups compared to uninfected subjects (all p-adj< 0.04). In addition, PCC subjects tended towards higher levels of IL-1RA compared to recovered group (padj= 0.071). Within PCC clusters, FGF-basic and RANTES were elevated while IL-2 and MIG were decreased in PCC3 and PCC5 compared to the other PCC clusters (all p-adj< 0.04). TNF-alpha, IP-10, G-CSF and MIP-1alpha were decreased in PCC3 and PCC5 not reaching statistical significance (all p-adj=0.07). Conclusion(s): Some cytokines remained altered in all SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects independently of persistent symptoms after 6 months from acute infection. Differences between PCC and recovered individuals are limited after correction. Importantly, PCC cytokine profiles showed differences between clusters, which suggests different PCC subsyndromes with distinct etiology. Subjects Characteristics (Table Presented).

Csf & Plasma Soluble Biomarkers in Neuro-Pasc: Preliminary Results from Covid Mind

Background: It is unknown whether individuals with neurological post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (NeuroPASC) display altered levels of neuroimmune activity or neuronal injury. Method(s): Participants with new or worsened neurologic symptoms at least 3 months after laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled in The COVID Mind Study at Yale. Never COVID controls (no history of COVID-19;nucleocapsid (N) antibody negative) were pre-pandemic or prospectively enrolled volunteers. CSF and plasma were assessed for neopterin and for IL-1beta, IL-1RA, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p40, IL-12p70, IL-13, MCP-1, TNFalpha by bead-based multiplex assay;and for anti-SARS-CoV-2 N antibodies by Luminex-based multiplex assay in technical replicate, normalized against bovine serum albumin conjugated beads. Plasma concentrations of D-dimer, C-reactive protein, neurofilament light chain (NFL), and glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) were measured using high-sensitivity immunoassays. Group comparisons used non-parametric tests. Result(s): NeuroPASC participants (n=38) were studied 329 (median) days (range 81-742) after first positive test for acute COVID-19. Cognitive impairment (84%) and fatigue (82%) were the most frequent post-COVID symptoms. NeuroPASC and controls (n=22) were median 49 vs 52 yrs old (p=0.9), 74% vs 32% female (p< 0.001), 76% vs 23% white race (p< 0.001), and 6% vs 57% smokers (p< 0.001). CSF white blood cells/mL, CSF protein, and serum:CSF albumin ratio were normal in both groups. CSF TNFalpha (0.66 vs 0.55 pg/ul) and plasma IL12p40 were higher (103.3 vs 42.7);and MCP-1 (503 vs 697 pg/ul) and IL-6 (1.32 vs 1.84 pg/ul;p < 0.05 for IL-6) were lower in NeuroPASC vs controls (p< 0.05);but none of these differences were significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. Plasma GFAP was elevated in NeuroPASC vs controls (54.4 vs 42.3 pg/ml;adjusted p< 0.03). There were no differences in the other biomarkers tested. 10/31 and 7/31 NeuroPASC had anti-N antibodies in CSF and plasma, respectively. Conclusion(s): When comparing NeuroPASC to never COVID controls, we found no evidence of neuroinflammation (normal CSF cell count, inflammatory cytokines) or blood-brain barrier dysfunction (normal albumin ratio), and no support for ongoing neuronal damage (normal plasma NFL). Future studies should include better gender and race matched controls and should explore the significance of a persistent CNS humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and elevated plasma GFAP after COVID-19. (Figure Presented).

Olfactory Performance in Post Mild-to-Moderate Acute Covid-19 across 2 Years

Background: Previous longitudinal studies (n=6) of objective olfaction performance post-acute COVID-19 have a maximum follow-up of 6-month and do not often test biomarkers. Although olfactory dysfunction appears to improve within two months of symptom onset, 4/6 longitudinal studies show persistent olfactory impairment. Method(s): PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients in the prospective ADAPT cohort (Sydney, Australia) were assessed across 18 acute symptoms and hospitalization status: 40% mild, 50% moderate, 10% severe/hospitalised - none deceased). Blood samples were taken 2 (N=179), 4 (N=148) and 12-month (N=118) post-diagnosis. The NIH Odor Identification Test (OIT) and the Cogstate brief cognitive battery were performed. 58 also had an olfaction test at 24-month. The OIT raw data were transformed into demographically-corrected T-scores. OIT's attrition was completely random and only initial age (40+/-15 versus 47+/-15) differed between patients lost to follow-up and those in the study at 24-month. We tested peripheral neurobiomarkers (NFL, GFAP, S100B, GM-CSF) and immune markers (Interleukin-IL panel: 1-beta, 1Ralpha, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12p40, 12p70, 13, and MCP-1, TNF-alpha and INF-gamma), analyzed as Log transformed and elevated/normal range using published references. Our previous analyses had shown no relationship with the kynurenine pathway, but an association of impaired olfaction and impaired cognition at 2-month only. Linear mixed effect regressions with time effect (months) tested olfaction trajectories (random subject effect) and their association with the biomarkers (main and time interaction). Result(s): At 2 months post-diagnosis 30% had impaired olfaction and those who had acute severe disease were more likely to be impaired (54% versus 26%, p=.009). 21%, 31% and 37% had impaired olfaction at 4, 12 and 24-months. Olfactory performance declined over time (p< .0001), which was dependent on the initial performance (Fig 1). Neurobiomarkers were within the normal range. IFN-gamma, IL-1Ralpha, IL-13 and TNF-alpha increased across time, p< .03-p< .0005. TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma showed a time covariance with poorer olfaction performance. Conclusion(s): Post-acute mild to moderate COVID-19 is associated with a declining olfactory performance up to 2-yr post-diagnosis, especially when initially impaired with the provisio of attrition although random. Olfactory performance decline may be mediated by upregulated immune parameters which are distinct from those driving cognitive changes. (Figure Presented).

Atrio-Ventricular Conduction Abnormalities in Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children

Purpose of study Since mid-April 2020 in Europe and North America, clusters of pediatric cases with a newly described severe systemic inflammatory response with shock have appeared. Patients had persistent fevers >38.5 C, hypotension, features of myocardial dysfunction, coagulopathy, gastrointestinal symptoms, rash, and elevated inflammatory markers without other causes of infection. The World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control, and Royal College of Paediatrics associated these symptoms with SARS-CoV-2 as multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C). Cardiac manifestations include coronary artery aneurysms, left ventricular systolic dysfunction evidenced by elevation of troponin-T (TnT) and pro-B-type naturietic peptide (proBNP), and electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities. We report the clinical course of three children with MIS-C while focusing on the unique atrioventricular (AV) conduction abnormalities. Case #1:19-year-old previously healthy Hispanic male presented with abdominal pain, fever, and non-bloody diarrhea for three days. He was febrile and hypotensive (80/47 mmHg) requiring fluid resuscitation. Symptoms, lab findings, and a positive COVID-19 antibody test were consistent with MIS-C. Methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and enoxaparin were started. He required epinephrine for shock and high flow nasal cannula for respiratory distress. Initial echocardiogram demonstrated a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40% with normal appearing coronaries. Troponin and proBNP were 0.41 ng/mL and proBNP 15,301 pg/mL respectively. ECG showed an incomplete right bundle branch block. He eventually became bradycardic to the 30s-50s and cardiac tracing revealed a complete AV block (figure 1a). Isoproterenol, a B1 receptor agonist, supported the severe bradycardia until the patient progressed to a type 2 second degree AV block (figure 1b). A second dose of IVIG was administered improving the rhythm to a type 1 second degree AV block. An IL-6 inhibitor, tocilizumab was given as the rhythm would not improve, and the patient soon converted to a first-degree AV block. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed septal predominant left ventricular hypertrophy and subepicardial enhancement along the basal inferior/anteroseptal walls typical for myocarditis. Case #2: 9-year-old previously healthy Hispanic male presented after three days of daily fevers, headaches, myalgias, diffuse abdominal pain, and ageusia. He was febrile, tachycardic, and hypotensive (68/39 mmHg). Hypotension of 50s/20s mmHg required 3 normal saline boluses of 20 ml/kg and initiation of an epinephrine drip. Severe hypoxia required endotracheal intubation. After the MIS-C diagnosis was made, he was treated with IVIG, mehtylprednisolone, enoxaparin, aspirin, and ceftriaxone. Due to elevated inflammatory markers by day 4 and patient's illness severity, a 7-day course of anakinra was initiated. Initial echocardiogram showed mild tricuspid and mitral regurgitation with a LVEF of 35-40%. Despite anti-inflammatory therapy, troponin and proBNP were 0.33 ng/mL and BNP of 25,335 pg/mL. A second echocardiogram confirmed poor function so milrinone was started. Only, after two doses of anakinra, LVEF soon normalized. Despite that, he progressively became bradycardic to the 50's. QTc was prolonged to 545 ms and worsened to a max of 592 ms. The aforementioned therapies were continued, and the bradycardia and QTc improved to 405 ms. Patient #3: 9-year-old African American male presented with four days of right sided abdominal pain, constipation, and non-bilious non-bloody emesis. He had a negative COVID test and unremarkable ultrasound of the appendix days prior. His history, elevated inflammatory markers, and positive COVID- 19 antibody were indicative of MIS-C. He was started on the appropriate medication regimen. Initial ECG showed sinus rhythm with normal intervals and echocardiogram was unremarkable. Repeat imaging by day three showed a decreased LVEF of 50%. ECG had since changed to a right bundle branch block. Anakinra as started and steroid dosing was increased. By day 5, he became bradycardic to the 50s and progressed to a junctional cardiac rhythm. Cardiac function normalized by day 7, and anakinra was subsequently stopped. Thereafter, heart rates ranged from 38-48 bpm requiring transfer to the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit for better monitoring and potential isoproterenol infusion. He remained well perfused, with continued medical management, heart rates improved. Methods used Retrospective Chart Review. Summary of results Non-specific T-wave, ST segment changes, and premature atrial or ventricular beats are the most often noted ECG anomalies. All patients initially had normal ECGs but developed bradycardia followed by either PR prolongation or QTc elongation. Two had mild LVEF dysfunction prior to developing third degree heart block and/or a junctional escape rhythm;one had moderate LVEF dysfunction that normalized before developing a prolonged QTc. Inflammatory and cardiac markers along with coagulation factors were the highest early in disease course, peak BNP occurred at approximately hospital day 3-4, and patient's typically had their lowest LVEF at day 5-6. Initial ECGs were benign with PR intervals below 200 milliseconds (ms). Collectively the length of time from initial symptom presentation till when ECG abnormalities began tended to be at day 8-9. Patients similarly developed increased QTc intervals later in the hospitalization. When comparing with the CRP and BNP trends, it appeared that the ECG changes (including PR and QTc elongation) occurred after the initial hyperinflammatory response. Conclusions Although the mechanism for COVID-19 induced heart block continues to be studied, it is suspected to be secondary to inflammation and edema of the conduction tissue. Insufficiency of the coronary arterial supply to the AV node and rest of the conduction system also seems to play a role. Although our patients had normal ECG findings, two developed bundle branch blocks prior to more complex rhythms near the peak of inflammatory marker values. Based on the premise that MIS-C is a hyperinflammatory response likely affecting conduction tissue, our group was treated with different regimens of IVIG, steroids, anakinra, and/or tocilizumab. Anakinra, being an IL-1 inhibitor, has been reported to dampen inflammation in viral myocarditis and tocilizumab has improved LVEF in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Based on our small case series, patient's with MISC can have AV nodal conduction abnormalities. The usual cocktail of IVIG and steroids helps;however, when there are more serious cases of cardiac inflammation, adjuvant immunosuppresants like anakinra and toculizumab can be beneficial. (Figure Presented).

Potential Predictors for Disease Severity in Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients

Background and Objectives Several studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 can induce a cytokine release storm which is a major cause of disease severity and death. Therefore, cytokine levels in the serum may predict disease severity and survival in patients with COVID-19. Methods We included 88 COVID-19 patients who were hospitalised at the Division of Pulmonology of the Vienna General Hospital between January and May 2021 in this observational trial. Blood samples for serum peptide measurements were drawn at the time closest to hospitalisation, at day 5, 9 and 13( +/- 1). We correlated the type of ventilation (nasal oxygen therapy, high flow nasal canula, non-invasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation), occurrence of consolidations on chest X-ray or if available HRCT and the level of care (general ward, IMCU or ICU) with serum peptide values. We assessed the concentration of cytokines (IL-1a, IL-1b, IL-1RA, IL-6, L-7, L-10, IFN- gamma and TNF-alpha), chemokines (CCL-3, CCL-4 and CCL-7) and growth factors (G-CSF, GM-CSF and VEGF). Results Patients were 68 years of age (median) and stayed in hospital between 5-171 days. The peak inspiratory pressure in patients receiving non-invasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation was significantly associated with IL-1RA, G-CSF and IFN-gamma and the fraction of inspired oxygen in patients receiving highflow nasal canula oxygen therapy was significantly associated with IL-6, IL-7, IFN-gamma, and CCL-7. Results are shown in Table 1. No investigated cytokine correlated with the type of ventilation, occurrence of consolidations on imaging and in-hospital mortality. Conclusions In conclusion, concentrations of IL-1RA, G-CSF, IL-6, IL-7, IFN-gamma, and CCL-7 were associated with more severe disease progression in hospitalised COVID-19 patients.

Galectin-3 as a possible marker for increased thrombogenicity in COVID-19

Background: Galectin-3 is a beta-galactoside-binding lectin that has been described to be overexpressed in inflammation, atherosclerosis, and in myocardial fibrosis. In COVID-19, galectin-3 has been proposed as an important regulator of the inflammatory response and fibrosis processes. The role of galectin-3 as a platelet activator and thrombosis enhancer has been also recently described. However, the role of galectin-3 in the thrombotic risk in COVID-19 hasn't been studied extensively. Method(s): Patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 were included in the study. Hospitalized patients with acute respiratory diseases without COVID-19 were examined as controls. We compared the levels of galectin- 3, soluble ST2, tissue factor and tissue factor activity (TFa) as well as several other markers of increased thrombogenicity in both groups. The correlations between galectin-3 and coagulation as well as inflammation markers were assessed. The SOFA score was used as a marker for the clinical outcome. Result(s): 93 patients were included into the study of which 56 were SARS-CoV-2 positive (COV+) and 37 were SARS-CoV-2 negative controls (COV-). Galectin-3 levels were higher in the COV+ group (median 7.10 ng/ml [IQR 4.61-9.81] vs. 5.47 ng/ml [3.63-6.66] p=0.016) as well as the TFa (median 334.48 pM [115.19-632.58] vs. 134.02 pM [86.92- 206.66]) and the ST2 levels (median 5.49 ng/ml [2.40-9.28] vs. 2.19 ng/ml [0.66-3.91] p<0.001). We also observed a positive correlation between galectin-3 and IL-6 (r=0.559, p<0.001), ST2 (r=0.332, p=0.005), SOFA score (r=0.441, p=0.003), von Willebrand factor (r=0.401, p<0.001), plasminogen (r=0.361, p=0.001), antithrombin (r=0.453, p<0.001), and Ddimer (r=0.377, p=0.001). Conclusion(s): In patients with acute respiratory diseases, especially with COVID-19, galectin-3 is a marker for increased hypercoagulability and worse clinical outcome. Galactin-3 might be a useful therapeutic target for patients with COVID-19.

Evaluation of serum interleukin-1 receptor antagonist levels in major depressive disorder: A case-control study.

Background and Aims: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by the occurrence of one or more depressive episodes lasting a minimum of 2 weeks and is marked by a persistently low mood and a lack of enjoyment in daily activities. The diagnosis of MDD is not possible by a well-established laboratory test or biomarker. A wide range of potential biomarkers for depression have been proposed by many studies, but none of them has adequately described the correlation between the biomarkers and depression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate serum interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) levels as an early depression risk factor. Methods: The present case-control study included 88 participants. Among them, 44 MDD patients enrolled from the psychiatry department of a public hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh, and 44 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs) from various sites in Dhaka city. A qualified psychiatrist evaluated the cases and HCs based on the fifth edition of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). The Hamilton depression (Ham-D) rating scale was employed to evaluate the intensity of depression. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Boster Bio, USA) was used to determine serum IL-1RA concentrations. Results: We observed no marked alteration in the serum concentration of IL-1RA in MDD patients in comparison to HCs (292.81 ± 24.81 and 288 ± 24.87 pg/mL; p > 0.05). Among MDD patients, we found no noteworthy association between the severity of depression and serum IL-1RA levels. Conclusion: The findings of the present study imply that IL-1RA may not be identified as a promising biomarker for risk assessment of depression. However, its neuroprotective role may be taken into consideration for the understanding of pathophysiology of MDD.

Differentially expressed FOXO1, NFE2L2 and NFKB1 mRNAs are associated with differentially regulated corona- and influenza viral receptor genes and Toll-like receptor pathway genes in human bronchial epithelial cells under hyperbaric oxygen exposure

As hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) has been shown to mitigate the COVID-19 symptoms, we were interested in studying whether HBO exposure affects expression of viral entry genes and innate immune genes in the air-liquid interface (ALI)-cultured human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) derived from normal individuals (NHBECs) and age-matched COPD patients (DHBECs), which were cultured under normoxia or daily exposure of 40-min hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) with 100% O2 at 2.5 ATA for 28 days in total. We found for the first time that HBO exposure differentially regulated mucociliary differentiation of HBECs by respectively decreasing and increasing expression of CGRP, MUC5AC, FOXJ1, NOTCH3 and HEYL in NHBECs and DHBECs, and respectively decreased and increased FOXO1 expression whereas increased and decreased NFE2L2 and NFKB1 expression in NHBECs and DHBECs, in association with respectively decreased and increased expression the SARS-CoV-2 entry genes ACE2 and 2 TMPRSS2 and the tight junction protein genes TJP1 and TJP2, and in association with respectively increased and decreased expression of the cell growth and inflammatory transcription factors SRF, c-FOS and TP63, as well as the TLR pathway genes TLR3, AKT1, IL-1B, IL-5, IL-6, IL-33, IRAK4 and NFKBIA in NHBECs and DHBECs. (Figure Presented).

Time-dependent molecular motifs of pulmonary fibrogenesis in COVID-19

Background: In COVID-19 survivors, there is an increased prevalence of pulmonary fibrosis of which the underlying molecular mechanisms are poorly understood. Aims and objectives: In this study, we aimed to gain insights into the evolution of pulmonary fibrogenesis in COVID19. Method(s): In this multicentric study, n=12 patients who succumbed to COVID-19 due to progressive respiratory failure were assigned to an early and late group (death within <=7 and >7 days of hospitalization, respectively) and compared to n=11 healthy controls;mRNA and protein expression were analyzed using a fibrosis-specific panel and immunostaining. Biological pathway analysis was performed using two different gene expression databases. Result(s): Median duration of hospitalization until death was 3 (IQR25-75, 3-3.75) and 14 (12.5-14) days in the early and late group, respectively. Fifty-eight out of 770 analyzed genes showed a significantly altered expression signature in COVID-19 compared to controls in a time-dependent manner. The entire study group showed an increased expression of Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Antigen 2 (BST2) and interleukin-1 receptor 1 (IL1R1), independent of hospitalization time. In the early group, there was increased activity of inflammation-related genes and pathways, while fibrosis-related genes (particularly PDGFRB) and pathways dominated in the late group. Conclusion(s): After the first week of hospitalization, there is a shift from pro-inflammatory to fibrogenic activity in severe COVID-19. IL1R1 and PDGFRB may serve as potential therapeutic targets in future studies.

Modulation of thromboinflammation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with aprotinin, low molecular weight heparin, and anakinra: the DAwn- AntiCo study

Background/Introduction: Thromboinflammation in severe COVID-19 is associated with disease severity and outcome. The kallikrein pathway is suggested to mediate thromboinflammation in COVID-19 by activating inflammatory pathways and contactmediated coagulation. Purpose(s): The DAWn-antico study investigates if a multitarget modulation of the thromboinflammatory response improves outcomes in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. Method(s): In this multicenter open-label randomized clinical trial (EudraCT 2020-001739-28), patients hospitalized with COVID- 19 were 1:2 randomized to receive standard of care (SOC) or SOC plus study intervention. The intervention consisted of aprotinin (2,000,000 IE IV four times daily) combined with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH;SC 50 IU/kg twice daily at the ward, 75 IU/kg twice daily at intensive care). Additionally, patients with predefined hyperinflammation received the interleukin-1- receptor antagonist anakinra (100mg IV four times daily). The primary outcome was time to a sustained 2-point improvement on the 7-point WHO ordinal scale for clinical status, or discharge. The trial was funded by Life Sciences Research Partners, Research Foundation Flanders (G0G4720N), and KU Leuven COVID-19 fund. Result(s): Between 24 June 2020 and 01 February 2021, 105 patients were randomized, and 102 patients were included in the full analysis set (intervention N=67 vs. SOC N=35). Twenty-five patients from the intervention group (37%) received anakinra. The intervention did not affect the primary outcome (HR 0.77 [CI 0.50;1.19], p=0.24) or mortality (intervention n=3 (4.6%) vs. SOC n=2 (5.7%), HR 0.82, [CI 0.14;4.94], p=0.83). There was one treatment-related adverse event in the intervention group (hematuria, 1.49%). There was one thrombotic event in the intervention group (1.49%) and one in the SOC group (2.86%), but no major bleedings. Conclusion(s): In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, modulation of thromboinflammation with high-dose aprotinin and LMWH with or without anakinra did not improve outcome in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. (Disclosure: this RCT was presented at ISTH 2022 in London and will be published in Research and Practise in Thrombosis and Haemostasis).

Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Post-COVID-19 Patients Improves Lung Function and Mechanics and Skeletal Muscle, and Immune Response

COVID-19 let sequelae beyond the respiratory system, including in skeletal muscle and in immune response. We evaluated the effects of 12 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), 3x/week, constituted by aerobic and resistance training on 28 moderate and severe post-COVID-19 patients. The results demonstrated that PR improved lung function, FVC (p<0.02), FEV1 (p<0.02), FEV1/FVC (p<0.01), MEF25% (p<0.006), MEF50% (p<0.03), and MEF75% (p<0.02). PR improved lung mechanics, respiratory impedance (Z5hz, p<0.03);respiratory reactance (X5Hz, p<0.01), resistance of the whole respiratory systems (R5Hz, p<0.03), central airway resistance (RCentral, p<0.03), and peripheral airway resistance (RPeripheral, p<0.02). PR improved peripheral muscle strength, increasing right (p<0.02) and left (p<0.01) hand grip strength and respiratory muscle strength, increasing maximum inspiratory (p<0.02) and expiratory (p<0.03) pressure. Of note, PR reduced pulmonary inflammation (breath condensate), reducing the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1beta (p<0.0001) and IL-6 (p<0.0001), while increased the levels of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-1RA (p<0.0004) and IL-10 (p<0.003), beyond to increase the levels of IFN-gamma (p<0.0002) and IFN-beta (p<0.008). PR reduced the serum levels of pro-inflammatory IL-1beta (p<0.006) and IL-6 (p<0.01), while increased the levels of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-1RA (p<0.0001) and IL-10 (p<0.0001), increasing the levels of IFN-gamma (p<0.02) and IFN-beta (p<0.001). PR reveals to be beneficial for post-COVID-19 patients, mitigating the sequelae observed in the respiratory system, skeletal muscle and in the immune response.

The Significance of Epidermal Growth Factor and Other Urinary Cytokines since Subclinical Aki in Patients with Covid-19

Introduction: In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, disease progression leading to acute kidney injury (AKI) may be driven by immune dysregulation. We explored the role of urinary cytokines and their relationship with the kidney stress biomarkers neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP7) in COVID-19 patients without AKI at study entry. Method(s): Prospective, longitudinal cohort study included critically ill COVID-19 patients without AKI at the time they were enrolled to the study. Urine samples were collected on admission to critical care areas for determination of NGAL, [TIMP-2]*[IGFBP7] and cytokines concentrations with a second sample 5 days after the first urine sample. Demographic information, clinical and laboratory data were collected. Diagnosis and staging of AKI were based on KDIGO criteria using serum creatinine (sCr) levels and urine output. The urinary concentrations of TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 were determined ELISA in the same way NGAL. The concentrations of cytokines and chemokines in urine were measured with a Luminex 200 instrument. We performed descriptive statistics including means and standard deviations for normally distributed continuous variables;medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for non-parametric distributions;and proportions for categorical variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the association between relevant covariates with AKI. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to compress and simplify the size of the data set by keeping the most important information and analyzing the structure of the observations and the variables. Correlation of identified cytokines with kidney stress biomarkers was explored using the Spearman test. All statistical tests were two-sided, p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The analysis was conducted using R Studio 1.4.1717. Result(s): Of included 51 patients. Of those, 30 were males (58.8%);the median age was 53 years (IQR: 40-61);14 had systemic arterial hypertension (27.5%);16 had diabetes (31.4%);and 21 were obese (41.2%). 54.9% developed AKI. After adjusting for possible confounding variables, only EGF >4600 pg/ml remained associated with lower risk of AKI (OR=0.095, 95% CI: 0.01-0.81, p=0.031.In the PCA of day 1, Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) and interferon (IFN)-alpha were associated with a lower risk of AKI (OR=0.24, 95% CI: 0.07-0.78, p=0.017), while Interleukin (IL)-12 and macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1b were associated with a higher risk of AKI (OR=51.09, 95% CI: 2.12-1233, p=0.015). In the PCA of day 5, EGF and IFN-alpha remained associated with a lower risk of AKI (OR=0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.74;p=0.024), while IL-1 Receptor, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), interferon-gamma-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) and IL-5 were associated with a higher risk of AKI (OR=7.7, 95% CI: 1.06-55.74, p=0.043). EGF had an inverse correlation with [TIMP2] x IGFBP7] (R-0.73, p=<0.001) and with NGAL (R= -0.63, p=0.002). Conclusion(s): Subclinical AKI was characterized by a significant up-regulation of NGAL, TIMP-2, IGFBP7 and proinflammatory cytokines. The lack of EGF regenerative effects and IFN-alpha antiviral activity seemed crucial for renal disease progression. AKI involved a proinflammatory urinary cytokine storm. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023